1.7 Select a Channel of Communication

[Author removed at request of original publisher] and Linda Macdonald

Learning Objective

  • Select the most appropriate channel and form for your message based on the purpose and audience.
  • Define media richness
  • Review individual rights to privacy in workplace communications

 

Purpose is closely associated with channel. Given the purpose and the audience, you will then select the best channel of communication.

Is a text message sufficient to deliver your message? When is it appropriate to send an instant message (IM) or text message? Or is a conventional e-mail or fax appropriate? So that readers can maintain file records, is a report attached to an email more desirable? Is the message too sensitive or complex and require in-person delivery? Do you need to address questions quickly?

Your decision should consider the audience’s preferences, the organization’s needs, the complexity of the message, and the need for “media richness”.

Features of Various Channels

Each channel has features that make it appropriate or inappropriate in certain situations. Each has its own strengths, weaknesses, and understood expectations as summarized below.

Face to face: Strengths include Non-verbal communication enhances the message, Good for rapid exchanges of information and Provides immediate feedback. Weaknesses: No record of interaction on file and no ability to edit the message, not suitable for large amounts of information. Expectations: Quick response. When to Choose: You need to express emotion in delivering sensitive information and when interaction and dialogue are preferable

Strengths: Very fast, Good for rapid exchanges of small amounts of information Inexpensive. Weaknesses: Informal Not suitable for large amounts of information; Abbreviations lead to misunderstandings. Expectations: Quick response. When to Choose: Informal use among peers at similar levels in an organization; You need a fast, inexpensive connection with a colleague over a small issue and limited amount of information

Email--Strengths Good for relatively fast exchanges of information “Subject” line specifies project for record-keeping Easy to distribute to multiple recipients Inexpensive Weaknesses May hit “send” prematurely May be overlooked or deleted without being read “Reply to all” or “Forward” errors Large attachments may cause the e-mail to be caught in recipient’s spam filter Expectations Normally a response is expected within 24 hours, although norms vary by situation and organizational culture When to Choose You need to communicate but do not need an immediate reply You need to send attachments (provided their file size is not too big)

Fax-- Strengths: fast; Provides documentation Weaknesses: Receiving issues (e.g., the receiving machine may be out of paper or toner); Long distance telephone charges apply; Rarely used telephone-based technology; losing popularity to online information exchange. Expectations; Normally, a long (multiple page) fax is not expected. When to Choose; You want to send a document whose format must remain intact as presented, such as a medical prescription or a signed work order; Allows use of letterhead to represent your company

Memo-- Strengths: Official but less formal than a letter; Clearly shows who sent it, when, and to whom. Weaknesses: Memos sent through e-mails can get deleted without review; Attachments can get removed by spam filters. Expectations: Normally used internally in an organization to communicate directives from management on policy and procedure, or documentation. When to Choose: You need to communicate a general message within an organization.

Report-- Strengths: Significant time for preparation and production. Weaknesses: Requires extensive research and documentation. Expectations: Specific formats for specific purposes; generally reports are to inform but may also be to recommend. When to Choose: You need to document the relationship(s) between large amounts of data to inform an internal or external audience

Check Your Knowledge (10 Questions)

Media Richness

By choosing the correct channel for a message, you can increase the likelihood that your message will be understood and acted upon in the manner you intended.

Your decision should consider the audience’s preferences, the organization’s needs, the complexity of the message, and the need for “media richness”. A phone call has less media richness than a Microsoft Teams or Zoom video call. The Zoom video call adds visual elements to the call that enhance the message; however, a video call usually lacks a full view of the speaker and all their non-verbal communications, and speakers often look at the listener’s image rather than the camera when they speak. A face-to-face meeting has greater media richness than a video call.

Four qualities determine a medium’s richness:

  • Multiple information cues simultaneously: The richer the medium, the more cues. The addition of body language to speech adds cues.
  • Speed of feedback: Richer media have faster response times. Feedback is immediate in a verbal exchange but delayed or non-existent through the medium of a poster.
  • Personal focus: A letter addressed to a single recipient has more personal focus than a poster visible to many.
  • Ability to use natural language. A face-to-face medium provides an opportunity to use more natural language because body language supplements the oral communication, the speaker can tell more easily when additional explanations are necessary, and the speaker is able to adjust the formality of the language for the context.

Diagram showing the media richness theory: Face to Face mediums are most effective for of communication while unaddressed documents are least.

Not all content should be delivered through a rich medium. Simple, routine messages only require a lean medium. A leaner medium is often the most efficient way to deliver content in business when the purpose is simply to inform the audience.

Check Your Knowledge

Privacy and Security of Electronic Communications

An employer has the right to view your electronic files stored on their network, to track you when using their equipment, and to view your company-provided social media or your personal but public posts. When you call and leave a voice message for a friend or colleague at work, do you know where your message is stored? Any time you send an IM, text, or e-mail or leave a voice message, your message is stored on more than one server, and it can be intercepted or forwarded to persons other than the intended receiver. Are you ready for your message to be broadcast to the world? Do your words represent you and your business in a positive light?

Conversation bubble saying, I"f it's on the Internet, it isn't private."Newsweek columnist Jennifer Ordoñez writes that it has become routine for employees to sign a consent form “attesting that you understand and accept that any e-mails you write, Internet sites you visit or business you conduct on your employer’s computer network are subject to inspection” (Ordoñez, 2008, para. 1). As you use Instagram, update your Facebook page, check LinkedIn, reply through Twitter, or send a text,  you leave an electronic trail of “bread crumbs” that merge personal and professional spheres, opening up significant issues of privacy. Anything you write or record in the workplace can be stored for later retrieval by people for whom your message was not initially intended.

Review any electronic communication before you send it. Spelling and grammatical errors will negatively impact your credibility. With written documents we often take time and care to get it right the first time, but the speed of IM, text, or e-mail often leads to bypassing this important review cycle of written works. Just because the message you prepare in IM is only one sentence long, doesn’t mean it can’t be misunderstood or expose you to liability. Take time when preparing your written messages, and review your work before you click “send.”

Check Your Knowledge (3 Questions)

 

Review: Context, Purpose, Audience, and Channel (5 Questions)

The following resource is adapted from Melissa Ashman and licensed with a Creative Commons – Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

Ordoñez, J. (2008, July 14). The technologist: They can’t hide their pryin’ eyes. Retrieved from http://www.newsweek.com/id/143737.

Photos:

“Photo of people holding each other’s hands” by faxels from Pexels
“Texting Congress 1” by afagen is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 2.0.“Email” by Javier Domínguez Ferreiro is licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0“74/465+1 Send/Fax” by DaveCrosby is licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0.
“Business letters” by 7102sew is licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0.
“Store Weekly Report” by joeyedeason1 is licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0.
“If it’s on the Internet, it isn’t private.” by DonkeyHotey is licensed under CC BY 2.0.

Diagram: Media Richness Theory Diagram PNG by Tntdj licensed under CC 3.0

License

Icon for the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Building Relationships With Business Communication Copyright © 2021 by [Author removed at request of original publisher] and Linda Macdonald is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.

Share This Book