Period of time
|
Significance of the period
|
Years
|
Event/Report
|
Period 1
Pre-Settlement
(… – 1671)
|
The sovereignty of Indigenous nations was unquestioned. E.g., the Mi’kmaw nation was sovereign, self-organizing, political, whole systems of knowledge. Traces of the past are evident in stories, place names, the language of Mi’kmaw’ki/L’nu.
RCAP (1996) Referred to the period before 1500 as separate worlds.
|
1372 (?)
|
Oral Histories
|
1493
|
Roman Catholic Papal Bulls
Doctrine of Discovery
|
1497
|
John Cabot contact Mi’kmaw
|
Period 2
Early Period of European Settlement and Treaty Making
(1671 – 1866)
|
Treaties were formed with settlers representing the crown, the church, the state. E.g., in Mi’maw’ki Chain of treaty agreements that spanned 1725-1779 (Marshall and Battiste, 2016).
(Brown et al, 2016, p.292)
Stage 2: Nation-to-Nation Relations
Encounters between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal people began to increase in number and complexity in the 1500s.
|
1672
|
Est. Hudson’s Bay Company
|
1716-63
|
Peace and Friendship Treaties
|
1725-1779
|
1763 Royal Proclamation
1776 Est. North West Comp.
|
1812
|
Selkirk Settlers Reach Winnipeg
War of 1812
|
1850-54
|
Robinson Treaties
|
Period 3
Treaty Making and DenialEstablishment of Legal Foundations of Canada
(1867 – 1968)
|
Indian Act 1867 – “The Indian Act facilitated a strategy of assimilation through incarceration (McMillan, 2018, p.85)”, multiple gradual amendments, increased the power of Indian Agents, and diminished the relative power of Indians to resist enfranchisement.
Stage 3: Respect Gives Way to Domination
In the 1800s, the relationship between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal people began to tilt on its foundation of rough equality. The number of settlers was swelling, and so was their power. As they dominated the land, so they came to dominate its original inhabitants.
|
1867
|
BNA Act a.k.a Constitution Act (1867)
Indian Act
Act of gradual enfranchisement 1869
|
1870
|
1870 Manitoba Act
|
1871
|
1871- 1929 Numbered Treaties #1-11
|
1912
|
Exchequer Court removes Membertou
|
1928
|
King v. Sylliboy
|
1967
|
The Hawthorn Report A Survey of the Contemporary Indians of Canada
The National Indian Brotherhood forms
|
Period 4 a
Organized National Political Resistance
(1969 – 1989)
|
From the 1960s onwards, many people within churches began to re-evaluate both the broader history of the relation between churches and Aboriginal people, and the specific history of residential schools.
Multiple Aboriginal advocacy organizations were established Regionally and Nationally (e.g., NWAC, Urban Friendship Centres, Indian Brotherhood, Union of NS Indians).
Stage 4: Renewal and Renegotiation
Resistance to assimilation grew weak, but it never died away. In the fourth stage of the relationship, it caught fire and began to grow into a political movement. One stimulus was the federal government’s White Paper on Indian policy, issued in 1969.
|
1969
|
The white paper policy
Harold Cardinal’s Red Paper (ref. Manuel, 2017, p. 95)
|
1970
|
The National Indian Brotherhood forms
|
1972
|
National Association of Friendship Centres https://nafc.ca/about-the-nafc/our-history
|
1973
|
Calder Decision (1973)
|
1974
|
Native Womens Association of Canada Established
|
1975
|
World Council on Indigenous Peoples, 1975
|
1977
|
Berger Report 1977
Lysysk Report 1977
|
1982
|
Constitution Act, 1982 (was BNA Act, 1867)
First Assembly of First Nations held
|
1983
|
Canada, House of Commons, Report of the Special Committee, Indian Self-Government in Canada (Ottawa: Minister of Supply and Services Canada, 1983).
1983 Marshall decision
|
1985
|
Report of the Task Force to Review Comprehensive Claims Policy, Living Treaties: Lasting
Agreements (Ottawa: Indian and Northern Affairs Canada, 1985);
|
1986
|
apologies issued by United Church of Canada in 1986 –1986 Royal Commission of the Donald Marshall Jr. Prosecution 1986 (Hickman, Poitras, and Evans, 1989).
|
Period 4 b
United Political Resistance/resurgence
Legal affirmations of Indigenous rights
(1990 – 2005)
|
Political resistance and resurgence. Increasingly legal decisions were being made in favor of Indigenous rights.
Formal dialogues developed around political reconciliation of Aboriginal rights and Indian Residential Schools.
|
1990
|
Nunavut Land Claim
Sparrow
Oka
CANDO
|
1991
|
Launch of Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples
|
1992
|
BC Treaty Commission (1992)
|
1996
|
Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples release Report (1996)
|
1997
|
Delgamuukw Court Case
|
Jan. 7, 1998
|
Statement of Reconciliation
Gathering strength: Canada’s Aboriginal Action Plan
|
1998 – 1999
|
Principles developed by the Working Group on Truth and Reconciliation and of the Exploratory Dialogues
|
1999
|
Aboriginal Finance Officers Association of Canada (AFOA) Formed
|
|
Alternative Dispute Resolution Program (2004)
|
2001
|
Multiple lawsuits filed by Oct. 2001
|
2004
|
2004, the Ontario Court of Appeal ruled Cloud v. Canada (Attorney General) 2004 CanLII 45444 (ON CA).
|
Period 4 c
Truth and Reconciliation
(2006 – 2015)
|
|
2006
|
Mandate Statement (2006)
Federal Apology (2006)
|
2007
|
Statements of Resignation
Public Media Reports
|
2008
|
TRC Launches
|
2012
|
They Came for the Children (2012)
TRC Interim Report (2012)
|
2015
|
TRC Final Report(s)
1 – 6
|
|
|
|
|
Feedback/Errata